Muhammad Khan, MD

# of Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Procedures Billed to Medicare
64

Total number of coronary angioplasty and stenting procedures this clinician billed to Medicare in the most recent 12-month claims period, according to CMS.

Percentile Rank (%)
89%

Percentile rank of 64 procedures compared to other clinicians with a primary specialty of interventional cardiology, cardiology and its subspecialties, cardiac or thoracic surgery, or internal medicine who have billed Medicare for at least one coronary angioplasty and stenting procedure in the same period.

The figures above reflect only procedures that this clinician billed to Medicare, according to CMS. Therefore, they may not reflect the total number of procedures this clinician performed during the 12-month reporting period. See Understanding CMS Data below.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (August 18, 2026 release).

Muhammad Khan's Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Billing Volume Compared to Peers

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 1-10 25th pct. 20 Median 40 75th pct. 750 Highest This clinician Volume: 64 Percentile Rank: 89% # of Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Procedures Billed to Medicare Percentile Rank (%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 1-10 25th pct. 20 Median 40 75th pct. 750 Highest This clinician Volume: 64 Percentile Rank: 89% # of Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting Procedures Billed to Medicare Percentile Rank (%)

Reading the curve: find a volume along the bottom, and the line gives the percentile of clinicians with a primary specialty of interventional cardiology, cardiology and its subspecialties, cardiac or thoracic surgery, or internal medicine at or below it. The marked point is this clinician. The shaded block covers the 2,604 clinicians CMS reports as 1-10, because CMS suppresses counts below 11. The axis runs from 0 to 750, the highest count CMS reports in the group, and gives low counts more room than high ones so the whole range fits. The labels under the axis mark the 25th percentile, the median and the 75th percentile; the 25th percentile falls inside the 1-10 range.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (August 18, 2026 release).

Coronary angioplasty and stenting procedures billed to Medicare at each tenth percentile of clinicians with a primary specialty of interventional cardiology, cardiology and its subspecialties, cardiac or thoracic surgery, or internal medicine. This clinician: 64, 89th percentile.
PercentileCoronary Angioplasty and Stenting Procedures billed to Medicare
30th11
40th15
50th20
60th26
70th34
80th45
90th66
Highest750

Previous data releases

CMS refreshes this data "on a quarterly basis, as technically feasible." The table shows this clinician's figures from each CMS data release.

CMS data release Coronary angioplasty and stenting procedures billed Percentile rank
August 18, 2026 Current 64 89%
August 11, 2026 Prior 64 89%
June 26, 2026 Prior 64 89%

About these releases. Each release counts procedures over what CMS describes as "a one-year observation window, with a lookback beginning three months prior to the present day", allowing three months for claims to be submitted and processed. CMS does not publish the start and end dates of the window behind any release, and consecutive releases may cover overlapping periods, or the same period with later-arriving claims added.

Understanding CMS Data

CMS's "Coronary angioplasty and stenting" category combines specific billing codes for treating the arteries of the heart to calculate the number of times each clinician billed Medicare for "Coronary angioplasty and stenting." These include balloon angioplasty, stent placement, plaque removal, and related catheter treatments, which patients often call heart stents or coronary stents. CMS names the category for the group of procedures it covers, not for what each one involved: a procedure counts whether or not it included a stent. CMS reports only procedures that clinicians billed to Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Therefore, CMS's procedure volume data does not include procedures that clinicians may have performed on patients who have other health care coverage (e.g., commercial insurance, self-pay, or the VA). Billing variation and coding errors can also affect CMS's data. Therefore, the number of procedures that CMS reports for a clinician may be higher or lower than the actual number of coronary angioplasty and stenting procedures a clinician performed during the reporting period. Lastly, only clinicians with a primary specialty of interventional cardiology, cardiology and its subspecialties, cardiac or thoracic surgery, or internal medicine (as reported to Medicare) are presented.

National Percentile Calculation

CMS publishes its own percentile for this data using a single, national pool that also includes clinicians with other primary specialties, such as Nurse Practitioner and Hospitalist. We use CMS's percentile formula, but restrict the comparison group to clinicians with a primary specialty of interventional cardiology, cardiology and its subspecialties, cardiac or thoracic surgery, or internal medicine, so our number answers a narrower question: how does this clinician's procedure volume compare with other clinicians who billed Medicare for at least one coronary angioplasty and stenting procedure and reported one of those as their primary specialty?